Nyrius ARIES Pro Digital Wireless HDMI Transmitter and Receiver System for Streaming HD 1080p 3D Video, Laptops, PC, Cablebox, Satellite, Blu-ray, PS3, Xbox (NPCS550)..
Grab Now Nyrius ARIES Pro Digital Wireless HDMI Transmitter and Receiver System for Streaming HD 1080p 3D Video, Laptops, PC, Cablebox, Satellite, Blu-ray, PS3, Xbox (NPCS550) By Nyrius
Most helpful customer reviews
81 of 90 people found the following review helpful.
By PlanetExpressShip
I spent a lot of time looking into WHDI devices like the Nyrius ARIES series. I was really impressed with all the good reviews. Unfortunately, I found the product to be misrepresented in marketing materials and the picture quality to be completely unacceptable.
The problem here is that Nyrius likes to claim their signal is "uncompressed." This is extremely misleading. The fact is, this device does not transmit a full unmodified 1080p signal. Nyrius (and other WHDI brands) conveniently omit the fact that the video signal is still modified. There's very little information on this online besides the incessant claims that the video quality is "Perfect" (source: whdi.org), "Uncompressed" (source: this product page), "lag-free" and so on. But nobody will claim it's exactly the same as an HDMI cable, because it isn't. After much digging I found that WHDI technology "prioritizes areas of visual significance" while giving less priority to others. Ultimately this means WHDI is using a motion estimation/detection algorithm just like any other video encoder/compressor. The difference is that they simply drop information rather than encode it into some other format, which would introduce lag. To me this means the signal is compressed, but if you want to get incredibly nitpicky and weaselly I guess you can claim it isn't since there's no format conversion going on. I always thought "compression" would mean taking a signal and making it fit in a smaller amount of bandwidth, which is what is happening here, but marketers really like to invent their own definitions for words.
For the technically minded, you can read more about their "totally not compressing anything" motion-estimation and prioritization algorithm here:[...]
To test, simply hook up a computer of some kind (I used a Mac Mini) and drag some windows around. In my case I had the transmitter and receiver within 2 feet or less of each other, and the built-in signal strength meter on the display indicated full quality. When any amount of motion is displayed on the screen (dragging a window would be an example of "high motion" for the purposes of video encoding) there is severe visible artifacting taking place. When hooked up over a straight high-speed HDMI cable, this artifacting is of course not present at all.
I double-checked that I had turned off my 5Ghz wireless router just to make sure it wasn't interfering. Picture quality (during motion) was still unacceptable and not at all close to the performance of a normal HDMI cable.
All that said, if you just don't care about top-notch visual quality and you just want a functional wireless video setup, this will work. The out-of-box experience was certainly extremely easy and it worked immediately. But if you are trying to solve a wiring problem I might suggest looking into HDMI-over-Cat5/6 baluns if it's an option for you. You can do a lot better than this solution.
37 of 40 people found the following review helpful.
By CHASER
First off...I do consider myself a professional photographerVideographer. I make a pretty decent living doing so. I shoot still photography wirelessly through wireless transmitters and allow my customers to view images immediately.I have been asked to provide video wirelessly to monitors throughout venues many times. I started investigating various products that could allow me to do just that. Teradek,Paralinx and several other companies had products that just appeared to pricy for ME. I shoot with high end canon 5d mark lll, canon 7d and canon xa10.I read about paralinx and while investigating them I ran across another review of this Nyrius Pro Aries. Well for the price I figured I would give it a try. I connected transmitter to my Canon xa10 and connected the receiver to my flat screen. When I selected hdmi imput, the camera was already connected!!!! Excellent picture quality.I walked through my home and loss signal briefly when I went downstairs into my garage (cinderblock) , at first it appeared to be a 1/4 second lag, I adjusted in camera settings and fixed that.I purchased a battery charger also to power the transmitter. I would recommend this product. Those units $1000.00 and more are going to need to change their pricing structure.
20 of 23 people found the following review helpful.
By EasE Prod
Great range, works with my Scarlet and F3 as well through a decimator. I got caught up in the hyp of buying what I was told a "pro" piece of equipment at Cinegear. A buddy of mine said to try this, and for the price tag, I said it was worth a shot. IT's the SAME THING, made by the SAME Company. They're all made in China, so don't buy the hype. One company is producing all of these. All the inputs, casing, everything minus the screen printing is the SAME. Functions the same also. No difference.
I bought another 2 of these, so now I have 4 systems, one cost $1k and the other three less then $700 combined.
A very interesting article. The insights are really helpful and informative. Thanks for posting. Visit here for more info.
BalasHapusforgot router password dlink
how to reset d'link router admin password
D-link Support Number Australia