Tampilkan postingan dengan label Card. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Card. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 10 Desember 2015

EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti with G-SYNC Support 2GB GDDR5 128bit, Dual-Link, DVI-I, HDMI, DP Graphics Card (02G-P4-3751-KR)

EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti with G-SYNC Support 2GB GDDR5 128bit, Dual-Link, DVI-I, HDMI, DP Graphics Card (02G-P4-3751-KR)..


EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti with G-SYNC Support 2GB GDDR5 128bit, Dual-Link, DVI-I, HDMI, DP Graphics Card (02G-P4-3751-KR)

GET EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti with G-SYNC Support 2GB GDDR5 128bit, Dual-Link, DVI-I, HDMI, DP Graphics Card (02G-P4-3751-KR) By EVGA

Most helpful customer reviews

18 of 19 people found the following review helpful.
5Nvidia does it again
By R. Kumar
If you're one of those folks who needs the biggest, baddest, etc, go buy yourself a Titan or a 780, or better yet, save yourself a few hundred and buy a 760.

For many though, a video card is the make or break component that defines whether you'll be watching each frame as it pops on your screen or actually enjoying playing on your gaming PC. For many that have an older system, or one that has an underpowered PSU, this is the best card you can get. It's fully bus powered, and will let you run games like WoW on Ultra at 100fps. More taxing games like Crysis will run at medium-high at 60fps. Mind you this is all at 1080p.

I built a DIY steam box, and was waiting for this card to come out. It's quiet, doesn't get hot at all, and again, is bus powered. So you can easily pop in this along with a decent core i5 and have yourself a great steam machine in a compact SFF case.

This is a great card, bar none one of the best bang for the bucks out there.

17 of 21 people found the following review helpful.
5Awesome Card
By Ryan Saputo
i ordered this for my computer which has a very bad power supply (350 w) and this card ran perfectly. Installation was very easy (no 6 pin power connector) and it runs all of my games. I can play Skyrim at around 50 fps on very high, Battlefield 4 at 45 fps on medium, and plenty of other games. I would strongly recommend this card.

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful.
5The Perfect Upgrade for Aging Pc's
By Michael
These are my system specs:
ASUS Desktop PC CM6850
Inter Core i5-2310 CPU @ 2.9GHz
12GB RAM
350W PSU

I purchased my rig about 1-2 years ago on sale at an Office Depot as a prebuilt PC. It is a stellar PC except for gaming, as it only uses an integrated Intel HD graphics card. If i wanted to upgrade this PC i would need to purchase a better power supply as well, as 350W isnt enough to support most modern cards. Luckily, the new Maxwell technology present in the 750ti allows it to run perfectly off of simply the power available from the motherboard itself. Ive tested a few games on max settings and all of them run at 60fps or above, such as: Skyrim, Left 4 Dead 2, Amneisa, and Just Cause 2. The best part about this card is it will not run up your electric bill! Overall, a solid 5/5

See all 50 customer reviews...More...


Kamis, 03 Desember 2015

SanDisk Ultra 16GB MicroSDHC Class 10/UHS-1 Memory Card Speed Up To 30MB/s With Adapter- SDSDQUA-016G-U46A (Label May Change)

SanDisk Ultra 16GB MicroSDHC Class 10/UHS-1 Memory Card Speed Up To 30MB/s With Adapter- SDSDQUA-016G-U46A (Label May Change)..


SanDisk Ultra 16GB MicroSDHC Class 10/UHS-1 Memory Card Speed Up To 30MB/s With Adapter- SDSDQUA-016G-U46A (Label May Change)

Grab Now SanDisk Ultra 16GB MicroSDHC Class 10/UHS-1 Memory Card Speed Up To 30MB/s With Adapter- SDSDQUA-016G-U46A (Label May Change) By SanDisk

Most helpful customer reviews

1682 of 1739 people found the following review helpful.
5Great w/ Galaxy S4 - No Complaints Here
By Hyoun Kim
I haven't had to buy a microSD card in a long time. The last time I bought one was for my cell phone over 2 years ago. But since my cellular contract was up, I knew I would have to get a newer card in addition to my new phone, the Samsung Galaxy S4. Reason for this is because I knew my small 16GB microSD card wasn't going to cut it.

Doing research on the Galaxy S4, I wanted to get the best card possible that had decent capacity (32 GB or greater). This led me to find that the Galaxy S4 supports the microSDXC Class 10 UHS-I card, which is the fastest possible given that class. Searching for that specifically on Amazon gave me results of only 3 vendors (as of April) that makes these microSDXC Class 10 UHS-1 cards. They are Sandisk (the majority), Samsung and Lexar. Nobody else makes these that are sold on Amazon.

Seeing how SanDisk is a pretty good name out of the 3 (I've used them the most), I decided upon the SanDisk because Lexar was overpriced and the Samsung one was overpriced (as well as not eligible for Amazon Prime).

But the scary thing is that when you filter by the SanDisk, you literally get DOZENS of options. All of them have different model numbers, different sizes, etc. Then there's that confusion of what's the difference between SDHC & SDXC?

SDHC vs SDXC:
SDHC stand for "Secure Digital High Capacity" and SDXC stands for "Secure Digital eXtended Capacity". Essentially these two cards are the same with the exception that SDHC only supports capcities up to 32GB and is formated with the FAT32 file system. The SDXC cards are formatted with the exFAT file system. If you use an SDXC card in a device, it must support that file system, otherwise it may not be recognizable and/or you have to reformat the card to FAT32.

FAT32 vs exFAT:
The differences between the two file systems means that FAT32 has a maximum file size of 4GB, limited by that file system. exFAT on the otherhand, supports file sizes up to 2TB (terabytes). The only thing you need to know here really is that it's possible your device doesn't support exFAT. If that's the case, just reformat it to FAT32. REMEMBER FORMATTING ERASES ALL DATA!

To clarify the model numbers, I I hopped over to the SanDisk official webpage. What I found there is that they offer two "highspeed" options for SanDisk cards. These are SanDisk Extreme Pro and SanDisk Ultra. SanDisk Extreme Pro is a line that supports read speeds up to 95MB/sec, however they are SDHC only. To make things worse, they are currently only available in 16GB & 8GB capacities. Since one of my requirements was to have a lot of storage, I ruled these out.

The remaining devices listed on Amazon's search were the SanDisk Ultra line. But here, confusion sets in because SanDisk separates these cards to two different devices. Cameras & mobile devices. Is there a real difference between the two or is this just a marketing stunt? Unfortunately I'm not sure but I do know the price difference between the two range from a couple cents to a few dollars. Since I wasn't sure, I opted for the one specifically targeted for mobile devices (just in case there is some kind of compatibility issue). To find the exact model number, I would go to Sandisk's webpage (sandisk.com) and compare their existing product lineup. From there, you get exact model numbers and you can then search Amazon for these model numbers. That is how I got mine (SDSDQUA-064G).

As for speed tests, I haven't run any specific testing, but copying 8 GB worth of data from my PC to the card literally took just a few minutes.

One last note is that Amazon attaches additional characters to the end (for example SDSDQUA-064G-AFFP-A vs SDSDQUA-064G-U46A). The difference between the two is that the "AFFP-A" means "Amazon Frustration Free Packaging". Other than that, these are exactly the same. If you're wondering what I got (and want to use it in your Galaxy S4), I got the SDSDQUA-064G-u46A and it works like charm.

1310 of 1375 people found the following review helpful.
5Top of the class among all (budget-priced) micro-SDHC cards I have tested / Works great in Galaxy S3
By NLee the Engineer
I have tested dozens of SDHC and micro-SDHC cards. One disturbing trend I noticed is that: the speed class rating for micro-SDHC is typically inflated. For example, a 'class-10' rating means the card must deliver a sequential write speed of at least 10MB/s. But somehow, a class-10 microSDHC cards is always slower than a class-10 SDHC card from the same manufacturer. Case in point: the PNY 32 GB microSDHC Card (P-SDU32G10-EFS2) claims to be 'class-10', yet it can only write at 8.6MB/s maximum, while the full-size PNY P-SDHC16G10 achieved 13.4MB/s according to CrystalDiskMark v3.01.

This SanDisk Ultra 32 GB microSDHC Class 10 UHS-1 card (SDSDQUA-032G-U46A), however, proves to be the exception. It achieved a sequential write speed of over 10MB/s according to two different benchmark programs (11.8MB/s in "CrystalDiskMark", 10.6MB/s in "H2testw v1.4"). This is faster than all my other microSDHC cards, including two 'class-10' cards from PNY and Polaroid.

A closer look at the file transfer speed using "Flash Memory Toolkit" revealed another nice surprise: For writing small files, this Sandisk Ultra microSDHC card performed just as well as its full-size counterpart, the SanDisk Ultra SDHC (SDSDU-032G-AFFP). In contrast, all my other class-10 microSDHC cards perform poorly while writing smaller files. See the benchmark results I uploaded to 'Customer Images' for details.

When you use a memory card in a digital camera to record HD video, it needs to store a huge video file each session. That means its sequential write speed is most critical. When used in a tablet or a smart phone, however, the card's random write speed for small files is more important. That's why in such applications, the Sandisk microSDHC will perform faster than the PNY and Polaroid cards, even though they are also rated as 'class-10'.

[Bottom Line]
As of this writing, the Sandisk Ultra microSDHC card ia actually priced lower than other class-10 cards from PNY and Polaroid. This makes the Sandisk the best value - especially if you need honest class-10 performance across all platforms.

[Side Notes]
- Do not confuse this Sandisk Ultra card with SanDisk Mobile Ultra microSDHC (SDSDQY-032G-U46A). The latter is rated for class-6 only.
- The size of this '32GB' card is 29.7GB according to my computer. This is actually normal because computer people count one Gig as "2 to the power 30", which is 7.3% larger than one billion. So 29.7GB translates to 31.9 billion bytes, which is '32GB' according to marketing people.

[Update on Feb 4, 2013]
1. Amazon combined the Sandisk Ultra 32GB and 64GB cards on the same product page. Please beware that your intended appliance must be compatible with 'SDXC' in order to used the 64GB version. My original review refers to the 32GB 'SDHC' version.

2. There are two part numbers for the same card. If you start from the Amazon product page and select 'Retail Packaging', you'll see the part number of SDSDQUA-032G-U46A. But if you click on 'Frustration Free Package', the part number changes to SDSDQU-032G-AFFP-A.

[Update on Oct 5, 2013]
The Sandisk microSDHC card works great in my new Samsung Galaxy S3, without the need for reformat (the default format is FAT32)

[Update on Dec 26, 2013]
My old test results were limited by the card reader and USB 2.0 port used. I re-tested the Sandisk UHS1 micro card using the Transcend RDF5 Card Reader connected to an USB 3.0 port. Here are the results from 'CrystalDiskMark 3.01 x64':
- Sequential Read speed = 40.0MB/s (was 34.8MB/s when connected to USB 2.0 port)
- Sequential Write speed = 13.1MB/s (was 12.6MB/s when connected to USB 2.0 port)

1258 of 1356 people found the following review helpful.
11 Star reviews - Micro SDXC card unmounts itself in Galaxy S4 - Solution found - RMA card - Faulty card - instructions in review
By SkincareCEO
NOTE: please read the last update (scroll to the bottom) - I'm leaving this review as 1 star as it appears to help others who purchased and had a similar experience.

I give SanDisk 5 stars for customer service and 1 star for the product (for those manufactured in the past) For those newly manufactured products that contain the software ROM fix, I'd give the product 5 stars.

To all those who purchased this card due to all the great reviews.... and then used it in a Galaxy S4 (GS4) smartphone for storage, the solution to the problem is not one you can solve without returning the card to SanDisk for a replacement under warranty. Believe me I tried everything that the Google searches returned as solutions... formatting as exFAT, formatting in the GS4 then copying data to the card while in the phone etc.... nothing worked... and so now please stop pulling out your hair and hopefully you will get the same result which I hope to get soon (just RMA'd and will send it back tomorrow for a free replacement under warranty).

The problem (As confirmed from the SanDisk customer support rep when I asked specifically asked him):

- When used in the GS4, this card will unmount itself inadvertently (may be true only for cards manufactured before the ROM patch described below was implemented in manufacturing). This can cause the data to become corrupt (luckily was not my experience) and / or can be very frustrating as most of us are saving 13 MP camera pictures to the card (or MP4 movies that stop in the middle of the movie) and it unmounts when you view the picture in the gallery or worse, right when you take the picture (this was the issue I experienced).

- SanDisk knows about this issue. Again, SANDISK KNOWS ABOUT THE ISSUE AND WILL REPLACE YOUR CARD. Call them (info below) and they WILL take care of it under warranty. They have a good name for a reason and they want to keep it. (sorry SanDisk about the 1 star, but I thought it was the way to get the message out to those searching for a solution)

- The customer rep told me that SanDisk tried to work with Samsung to resolve the issue but Samsung refused to acknowledge a problem exists with this card and some of their phones (especially their flagship GS4 phones).

- The customer rep told me that to their knowledge the card works fine in regular cameras (not Samsung GS4 phones with cameras, obviously) and even worked fine in some phones from HTC etc. that could accommodate the 64 GB cards. Hence the 5 star ratings from others.

- The solution SanDisk came up with was to write a patch into the ROM of the card itself to specifically address the issue on Samsung GS4 phones (and maybe other Samsung phones like the GS3). I was assured that the new card I would get would work flawlessly. will see in about 3 weeks.

- I purchased my card from Amazon June 2013, so the ones currently being manufactured and the one I should get will have the new patch. However, as SanDisk manufactures in batches (like most of the industry), old batches of "unpatched" cards obviously exist in warehouses.

- I asked about a software patch I could download and was told it's not possible... hence the "hard coded patch" in the card's ROM

So... how to take care of the problem....

After speaking with the SanDisk US customer support (link and info below), this is what I learned and did.
Go to the SanDisk site

1) [...]
2) call consumer products support (this is the US no.) 1-866-SANDISK (726-3475)
3) Tell them that the card is unmounting itself in your GS4 (I assume this is also a problem experienced by GS3 owners too)
4) They will then confirm your information, approve your return (10-15 min approval window by mine was basically instantaneously), and then send you emails with a UPS return label and instructions.
5) BTW, they also asked if I had a magnifying glass to ID the serial no. on the card, but I didn't and couldn't read it myself (those numbers are super small printed into the plastic... don't believe me? take a look yourself.) I told the rep I couldn't read them and he said no problem, they would process without the serial no. I assume this is because they send you a new replacement card only when they receive your card you send in. Makes sense.

Well, that's it. Problem (hopefully) solved. Let's see in 2-3 weeks. The rep was super nice about it and seemed like they were all too familiar with the problem. KUDOS TO SANDISK FOR TAKING CARE OF IT... however, it would be nice if there was some type of communication / notice of the issue besides Google info sources, forums etc. I spent hours, maybe a couple of days total hours worth, thinking it was an issue with my phone / my data transfer. oh well, that's how it goes.

I really hope that this review helps some of you out there with the same problem as me. GOOD LUCK!!

(btw, I'd give the card 5 stars if this problem was solved in the patched ROM of newer cards as the data transfer speeds are awesome on the card (tested transferring data via a card reader hooked to my computer)... if the data transfer / remaining mounted in the GS4 issue never existed (pre-patch of ROM, of course))

UPDATE: 08/17/2013 - All went well with the return of the SanDisk Storage card. UPS shipping took about 2 days from when I sent it, SanDisk verified the warranty claim 1 day later and 5 hours later that same day, my replacement card had been shipped. waiting on the new card now, but expect to test it out very soon (early next week). will update the post after testing out the new card. Just as a reference, I've been using a 32GB Micro SD HC SanDisk card in the GS4 since having shipped the 64GB card. Obviously it's a different card and not the Micro SD XC kind. Other than a bit slower access speeds to the card, absolutely zero problems.... well if you don't count that it's basically filled up, hence why the 64GB option is great on the GS4. So it proves the point on the problem with the early build Micro SD XC 64GB cards.

I'm happy to see that my review has helped some others out there. Good luck to you in your warranty claim. my experience with SanDisk customer support has been excellent so far.

Update: 08/21/2013 - Received the new replacement SanDisk Storage card just a few days ago (shipping back to me once they agreed it was defective was a very short time window). Have had it running in the Galaxy S4 for a few days now without any jumps, stutters or card unloading in the middle of picture or video taking. Card seems to work flawlessly as the SanDisk Rep mentioned it would. One would think it's such a short time to test after a few days of use, but if this were not fixed already it would have dismounted in the first 45 minutes... that's how often and how fast it was occurring. so it would seem the problem is solved. The new SD card makes the phone even more responsive when moving between pictures in the gallery and performing other tasks like copying files to the card. Thanks SanDisk! Unless I update this review by next week, you will know that the problem has been fixed.

Good luck to those with similar problems as we now know how to get it fixed thanks to SanDisks great responsive customer service.

Update: 08/31/2013 - This is the last update to this review just to "close the loop". The new replacement card from SanDisk has been running flawlessly for about 2 weeks now. I have not experienced any of the initial problems. SanDisk really did fix the issues in the new batch of cards.

Update: 12/09/2013 - The card has been running in my GS4 flawlessly since replacing it around Aug 21st. Pretty good track record so far (~ 3.5 months) so it appears to be fixed with the newly manufactured (replacement) cards.

For those that have left comments that I should change the rating upwards now that the issue is fixed (see my addition at the beginning of this review)... When searching for a solution to a problem with a purchased product, most people start at the 1 star reviews to see what others have experienced. This is especially true for products with a lot of reviews (this is what I did in the beginning with this product). Therefore I think leaving it at 1 star and adding the comments at the beginning should clarify the review.

Thanks to review commenter "Da Shocker" for his input. I think he sums it up very well when it comes to the value of files stored on media like this:

"One more thing.. to those not happy with the one star rating by this person go ahead buy one. Take tons of pics vids and save some music on there then when the card crashes come back and give it a five star. A card cost $50-$100 pictures from a vacation or family event are priceless.. "

See all 12503 customer reviews...More...


Selasa, 01 Desember 2015

Asus ATI Radeon HD6450 Silence 1 GB DDR3 VGA/DVI/HDMI Low Profile PCI-Express Video Card - EAH6450 SILENT/DI/1GD3(LP)

Asus ATI Radeon HD6450 Silence 1 GB DDR3 VGA/DVI/HDMI Low Profile PCI-Express Video Card - EAH6450 SILENT/DI/1GD3(LP)..


Asus ATI Radeon HD6450 Silence 1 GB DDR3 VGA/DVI/HDMI Low Profile PCI-Express Video Card - EAH6450 SILENT/DI/1GD3(LP)

GET Asus ATI Radeon HD6450 Silence 1 GB DDR3 VGA/DVI/HDMI Low Profile PCI-Express Video Card - EAH6450 SILENT/DI/1GD3(LP) By Asus

Most helpful customer reviews

59 of 64 people found the following review helpful.
5Perfect choice for an older, small-form factor computer
By team W
I have an HP Slimline mini desktop dating from about 2009. (HP S5310t - but the slimline HPs from that era all used a similar form factor). The video card died when the fan on it seized up, and so I found myself shopping for a replacement. Going shopping for a video card for an older computer with a very small form factor is definitely a little unnerving.

On a computer this old, I am not exactly looking for serious gaming performance. Anything out there is a few generations ahead of what I had, so relative power is not the key question. Instead, my main concerns were:

(1) Will it actually fit in my small case?

(2) Will it actually work once I get it in there?

As for making it fit, this card is "Low profile ready". What that means is it won't fit a small computer case when it comes out of the box, but they give you the pieces you need to make it fit. Basically the little metal plate at the back of the card where you plug the card into the monitor cable is too long, but they give you two shorter plates that you can swap out for the big one.

One short connector plate is for the newer, digital connectors (DVI & HDMI) and the second is for the more basic, VGA connector. You can actually have all three connectors available, even when the card is installed in a small computer, just as long as there are two open slots on the back of the case next to each other. The cable that connects the VGA out to the card is long enough that you can reach the second opening in the back of the case. I happened to have that space available on my computer and so I set it up that way. All you need to swap out the back plates is a small diameter Phillips head screwdriver and some needle-nose pliers for the little bolts that hold it to the card. This is not a task for people terrified of anything remotely mechanical, but it is not hard to do if you are at least modestly handy.

Of course, making it fit is not just about the shorter plate on the back of the card, it also means that the card has to fit INSIDE the computer. A really, really fat video card with huge heat sinks all over it might not have enough space to fit inside a mini tower case.

Because this card doesn't have a fan and just uses a big heat sink to keep it cool, I was a little worried it would be too fat. But it is really barely thicker than the thickness of the back plate, and so it ought to fit pretty well everywhere. It really doesn't look much bigger than the card it replaced. I definitely like the idea of no separate fan on the video card, since the failure of the last fan was what caused me to go shopping for a new card in the first place. No fan means one less thing to wear out and break. It also makes the computer slightly quieter.

Anyway, I got the thing physically into the computer with no real hassles. So now it was time to reconnect the monitor cable, boot up the computer and brace myself for the possibility of a very rough ride. When you are installing a new video card, you are messing around with a lot drivers and so forth in the guts of Windows, and things can easily go south on you.

Turns out the install was actually fairly quick and painless. I have a 64 bit, Windows 7 OS, and for me the install actually went very smoothly. Just leave it alone and let it auto-start. It chugs along and requires a reboot but that's it. I was a little worried that my PCI Express x16 (1.0) bus was going make this newer, Express 2.1 card unhappy, but it seems fine. PCI Express is backward compatible, it just means the card runs a bit slower.

Before installing anything I did take the step of uninstalling the device driver software for the older card, so there was nothing but the built in windows drivers on the system when I installed this. They don't tell you to do this, but it is a very good idea to clear out any old drivers to avoid driver conflicts.

Whole process from opening the box to finishing the install took maybe 30 minutes, including installing the new back plates on the card. Not bad at all.

Now that all is up and running, it comes with a monitor utility that shows both capacity of the card and heat. Pushing full HD video out to a 24 inch monitor video through the DVI connector runs the card at roughly 30-50% of capacity and the temp seems to be well within the acceptable range. I haven't done long-term studies of the heat profile yet, but since I am mainly going to be using this computer for business productivity stuff and rarely even using it for video, I am not too worried about it. I think, at least for those light-duty users like me, a card with no fan on it is definitely the way to go.

You can actually overclock the card using the software they provide. I am not going to bother since I don't need every bit of performance here, but it is nice to see that they will let you push the card to its limit if you need to.

We'll see whether it holds up, but so far, this was a good purchase. Shopping for this was definitely a bit of a hassle, and I was worried the installation would be difficult, but it turned out just fine for me. I am back in business for not much money and will probably get at least another couple years out of this computer now. I figure it was worth the modest, incremental cost to get an ASUS, which is one of the larger and better known board makers. Maybe I could have saved a few bucks by going with one of these companies I'd never heard of, but for something like this, where a lot can easily go wrong, less hassle is definitely worth a little more cash.

52 of 58 people found the following review helpful.
5A graphic card planned for your desktop
By David
If you have an integrated graphic card on your motherboard, radeon 6450 will be a good choice to add it.
For example, my desktop pc is a pentium e5800, 4 gb RAM, 500 HDD, power supply 275 Watts. I bought it recently because i use it for office work and sometimes a game. When i put it windows experience index increased from 3,4 to 4,5 in windows aero and from 3,4 to 6,1 in gaming graphics! You will notice that your memory ram use will be low than before and your HD video performance will get better. The graphic card consumption is very low and temperature is around 50 C (122 F) (the temperature is showed by smartdoctor software that it is included). Of course, radeon 6450 it is not for heavy gamers or full resolution games but it is more powerful by far than my GMA x4500HD intel integrated graphic card.

21 of 23 people found the following review helpful.
5Great for HTPC's and office computers
By Gearhead Mania
Asus AMD Radeon HD 6450 1GB DDR3, Silent

I'll be blunt, the HD 6450 is not designed for playing the latest games. I'm hesitant to try older games with it, but it is a significant improvement over Intel's integrated HD2000 and HD3000 graphics in its Sandybridge processors. Intel's HD2000/HD3000 have serious issues with certain movie formats and overscanning with LCD TV's using the HDMI port. I cannot watch MotoGP.com videos in 720P with the HD2000 or HD3000 due to artifacts on the lower half of the screen. I read that 23.97 frame rate movies cannot be played either.

So for a HTPC build, or for a general-use build, this is where the HD 6450 shines! It sips energy, so you can run it with a 300W PSU. There's no fan, just a large heatsink so it runs silent. It doesn't get hot and doesn't use much power, and is DirectX 11 compatible. I ran 3DMark11 and got a low 501 score with a Core i3-2120 processor, so it is not setting any records. But it is reliable and runs cold.

Using Windows 7's built-in experience index, it went from 5.1 desktop aero graphics using my Intel HD2000, to a 4.5 with the HD 6450. I feel this is a misleading index anyhow. The gaming index with the 6450 Is 6.1, but it isn't that fast for 3D gaming.

The 6450 works straight out of the box with LCD TV's without any overscan issues. The HDMI audio is a bit low in volume, I have to turn it up to 100 just to get decent sound out of my TV.

Overall: 5/5 stars, does the work just fine for a HTPC build or for the office. It is silent, it runs cold, and it doesn't use a lot of power. So far it seems to run rock steady reliable as well. Just don't plan to play the latest 3D games.

See all 193 customer reviews...More...


Selasa, 24 November 2015

Sandisk 16GB MicroSDHC Memory Card, Class 4 (RETAIL PACKAGE)

Sandisk 16GB MicroSDHC Memory Card, Class 4 (RETAIL PACKAGE)..


Sandisk 16GB MicroSDHC Memory Card, Class 4 (RETAIL PACKAGE)

GET Sandisk 16GB MicroSDHC Memory Card, Class 4 (RETAIL PACKAGE) By SanDisk

Most helpful customer reviews

151 of 157 people found the following review helpful.
5Maximum storage, minimum hasle
By Ira B. Steinberg
Though I wish I had waited a couple of weeks to buy this card (the price dropped 30 dollars in the past two weeks), I have nothing but good things to say about the card. Easy to load, easy to read. I managed to put about 11 gigs on here in the first three days (lots of music) and the access has been flawless. Word of caution, be careful with the card reader. My first attempt led to a corrupted card which I had to return. May have been a manufacturing defect (bought from best buy, not from Amazon. Best buy charged 99.00). I reccomend loading the card in the device before adding data rather than using the reader and then inserting loaded card.

All in all, a miracle of storage on a tiny card. I eagerly await the 32 gb in a year or two.

120 of 127 people found the following review helpful.
5Exactly what it says
By Joshua J. Susmarski
Great card, works great, is exactly what it says, and comes with SanDisk's standard warranty. A couple things to remember, 16 "gigabytes" in manufacturer terms equates to about 14.9 true formatted gigabytes (because a kilo for a computer is 1024). Also the MicroSDHC standard is the same card and interface as the old MicroSD; the difference is in the compression method. This means that many smartphones that didn't support SDHC when they were made can support it if the software is upgraded. An example of this is any Windows Mobile phone that has been upgraded to WinMo 6.1; 6.1 supports SDHC.

60 of 69 people found the following review helpful.
516 GB for my Google phone
By Karl Deitch
I bought this microSD card for my G1 phone and it works great no problems.

See all 1742 customer reviews...More...


Senin, 23 November 2015

Kingston USB 3.0 Memory Card Reader FCR-HS3

Kingston USB 3.0 Memory Card Reader FCR-HS3..


Kingston USB 3.0 Memory Card Reader FCR-HS3

Buy Kingston USB 3.0 Memory Card Reader FCR-HS3 By Kingston

Most helpful customer reviews

56 of 58 people found the following review helpful.
5Super Card Reader
By WMWM
Ive been looking for a fast card reader to import all my DSLR RAW+Jpeg shots without taking forever. Even though this one seemed a bit more expensive, i can assure you, its worth it. Most important thing, speed, which is very fast, i got sustained speeds of 40+ MBps with a Sandisk ExtremePro 16 GB (theoretical max speed of 45MBps) . When the card is in use, the red kingston logo lights up. Also durability is a giant plus, you cannot tell from the photos, but the top shell is made from dark brushed metal, giving it a classy and cool look while hiding fingerprints, along with looking chiseled. The cord is 2.5 ft long so it suits my purposes well. Even if this wasnt USB 3.0 it would still be a great USB 2.0 card reader. 5 stars!

Pros:
Fast USB 3 speeds
cord is replacable
Brushed metal shell
lighted kingston logo
2 year warranty

Cons:
expensive

40 of 40 people found the following review helpful.
5Works as expected. Solid construction.
By Wes
I needed a reader to replace my built in reader to the PC. So I got this reader + the Plugable USB 3.0 card.

I've used the SD and CF slots, and they are very easy to access. The cards go in and come out without the awkward bumps or need to use strange hand contortions.

I also capture some statistics, although I'm not sure how relevant this is to the reader itself since, the media you are accessing generally limits the transfer rate. I wish I had some type of media that actually exceeded the rate of transfer USB 3.0 provides to test the reader, but I don't have anything that fast right now.

Kingston's USB 3.0 Media Reader Computer Memory FCR-HS3
Plugable PCI Express to SuperSpeed USB 3.0 2-Port Expansion Card for Desktops (NEC/Renesas Chipset)

Windows 7 64bit
2.79 GB file transfer from local HD to memory card
I took the average reading from the last 15 seconds of data transfer

SECURE DIGITAL
Sandisk Ultra 64gb (rated 30 MB/s)
Write 12.6 MB/s
Read 40.2 MB/s

Transcend 32gb (rated ?)
Write 18.7 MB/s
Read 21.8 MB/s

Patriot LX Series 32gb (rated ?)
Write 11.0 MB/s
Read 22.3 MB/s

COMPACT FLASH
Lexar UDMA 7 CF 64gb (rated 400x)
Write 58.2 MB/s
Read 106.0 MB/s

47 of 49 people found the following review helpful.
5I LOVE THIS PRODUCT!
By Sally
Buy this reader - it is a dream compared to USB 2.0 readers, and its price make it the obvious choice compared to the other products in this arena.

I shoot with a 21mp Canon 5D Mark II, and the largest cards I have are 32 gig compact flash cards. In moving from USB 2.0 to Firewire 800 on my Mac, to USB 3.0 with this reader, it's a delight to see my 32 gig card downloaded in just over 7 minutes compared to what would have taken around 40 minutes with USB 2.0.

The reader supports other card types, but I do not have those and so cannot comment on its performance with them.

See all 385 customer reviews...More...


Minggu, 22 November 2015

eSecure All-in-1 USB Card Reader for all Digital Memory Cards

eSecure All-in-1 USB Card Reader for all Digital Memory Cards..


eSecure All-in-1 USB Card Reader for all Digital Memory Cards

Grab Now eSecure All-in-1 USB Card Reader for all Digital Memory Cards By eSecure

Most helpful customer reviews

66 of 68 people found the following review helpful.
4Portable Multi-Card (SD, SDHC, CF, MMC, Etc.) Reader
By Richard La Barca
This little multi-card reader is a nice item to have...it's small enough to carry with you to use with your laptop, netbook or other USB enabled device to read, copy or transfer files on various memory cards.

My main purpose was to have a CF (compact flash, which I still use) reader to use with my laptop. For the couple of bucks paid, I am very happy with this item.

The only thing lacking is that it will only read one card at a time...it shows as a single USB connected device in Windows Explorer (My Computer).

Still, this is just a very convenient card reader to have available.

98 of 106 people found the following review helpful.
5Big Bang, Little Bucks!!!! GREAT
By The One
So i bought a Lexar and an Esecure All in 1 mini card reader. Today i received both and put them to the test.

TEST
Transfer 4 mov files that total 877mb. Here are the results.
CF Card used Transcend 600x

Lexar (FIREWIRE 400)
test 1 = 00:00'58"3
test 2 = 00:00'58"4
test 3 = 00:00'58"3

Esecure (USB 2.0)
test 1 = 00:00'27"1
test 2 = 00:00'34"2
test 3 = 00:00'26"1

I was a little disappointed that the Lexar took longer because i expected it to be faster.

Lexar - CF cards ONLY
Esecure - 150 different cards

Lexar - Expensive (approx $45)
Esecure - Cheap (approx $10)

The size of the Esecure is smaller than the Lexar.

WINNER ESECURE ALL in 1 by far. Recommended by me.

I'll update review if things change as far as malfunctions and durability.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003CKC8W8/ref=oh_details_o06_s02_i00

Hope this review was helpful.

57 of 63 people found the following review helpful.
1Don't be tempted to buy this card reader if you use CF.
By Loeb
The form factor and feature set for this card reader is awesome. The price is awesome too. I read all the reviews for this card reader and decided that I am more careful than the other reviewers who bent the pins in the CF slot. Wrong. Even though I knew to be extra careful and I have never bent a pin in another CF reader, this one bent after only a few uses. If you need to use the CF slot, find another product.

See all 480 customer reviews...More...


Sabtu, 14 November 2015

16GB PlayStation Vita Memory Card

16GB PlayStation Vita Memory Card..


16GB PlayStation Vita Memory Card

Buy 16GB PlayStation Vita Memory Card By Sony

Most helpful customer reviews

161 of 180 people found the following review helpful.
3Good card to be able to hold a few games, but pricey
By Bobby Shornock
Updated 2/13/13: My entire review is not visible unless you look at this in comment form, I apologize for the inconvenience. I also apologize for the massive length of this post, however appreciate everyone's support.

If you plan on using your Playstation Vita for game saves ONLY, then this is what the 4GB card is for. But let's face it, there will be people that want to revisit their PSP library, there will be people taking pictures, or putting their music on their vita to listen to with some games. For $16.99-20 bucks it's affordable, but it's the worst storage to price ratio, as expected.

But, let's look at the size of the Vita games:

%Alien Breed: 123MB
AR Play 2012 Holiday Bundle: 1.13GB
Army Corps of Hell: 625 MB
Asphalt: Injection: 765 MB(Demo is the same size)
Assassins Creed III Liberation: 2.6GB(Version 1.02 of physical media takes 30MB)
Ben 10 Galactic Racing: 968 MB
!Bentley's Hackpack: 785MB
Big Sky Infinity PSVita: 329MB
BlazBlue: Continuum Shift EXTEND: 3.33GB(Good luck fitting this game on a 4GB card, and be able to do anything else, Version 1.00 of physical media takes 2912KB)
Burn the Rope: 31.4MB
Call of Duty: Black Ops - Declassified: 2.5GB(Version 1.02 of physical media takes 376MB)
@Chronovolt: 262MB
Disgaea 3: Absence of Detention: 2.05GB(Version 1.00 of physical media takes 4896KB)
DJMAX Technika Tune: 3.1GB
Doctor Who The Eternity Clock: 767MB
Dokuro: 310MB
Dungeon Hunter Alliance: 1.03GB(Cross Platform play with PS3 is not supported, Version 1.00 of physical media takes 1024KB)
Dynasty Warriors NEXT: 1.5GB(Demo is 214MB, Version 1.01 of Physical media with all DLC installed takes 62MB)
EA Sports FIFA Soccer: 3GB(Demo is 1.7GB, Cross platform play is NOT supported)
Earth Defense Force 2017 Portable: 632MB, Version 1.00 of Physical Media with all DLC installed takes 636MB)
*Ecolibrium: 223MB
*Escape Plan(PSN Only): 842MB(Demo is 541MB)
F1 2011: 1.42GB
FIFA Soccer 13: 2.8GB
@!%+*Foosball 2012: 134MB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.00 takes 150MB)
*Frobisher Says: 488MB
Gravity Rush: 1.5GB(Demo is 472MB, Version 1.00 of physical media with all DLC takes 3104KB)
Hot Shots Golf: World Invitationa]: 1.15GB(Demo 280MB, version 1.03 of physical media takes 134MB)
!%+*Hustle Kings PSVita(PSN Only): Demo is 325MB, Version 1.01 with all Add-ons except Time Savers pack takes 481MB
@Jet Set Radio: 1.10GB
Jetpack Joyride: 31.1MB(Free as of 1/1/13, Version 1.02 of Physical media takes 38MB)
Kyntt Underground: 672MB
LEGO Batman 2 Super Heroes: 1.1GB
Lego Harry Potter: Years 5-7: 1.2GB
LEGO Lord of the Rings: 1.8GB
*LittleBigPlanet: 1.1GB(Demo is the same size, all content downloaded is shared with LittleBigPlanet 2 and LittleBigPlanet Karting when it comes out, Version 1.07 of physical media with a few pieces of DLC takes 213MB)
Little Deviants: 940MB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.01 of physical media takes 28MB)
Lumines: Electronic Symphony: 722MB(Demo is the same size, Version of 1.01 of physical media takes 22MB)
Madden NFL 13: 3GB
Metal Gear Solid HD Collection: 3.3GB(Good luck fitting this on a 4GB card, and having room for much else, Version 1.00 of physical media takes 2240KB)
Metal Gear Solid 2 Sons of Liberty: 1.6GB
Metal Gear Solid 3 Snake Eater: 1.8GB
Michael Jackson The Experience: 1.6GB
MLB 12 The Show: 2.8GB(Version 1.01 of physical media takes 8768KB)
ModNation Racers: Road Trip: 1.5GB(Demo is 486MB, Version 1.01 of physical media takes 91MB)
Mortal Kombat: 3GB(Version 1.00 of Physical media takes 608KB)
+*Motorstorm RC: 647MB(Free if you got the Scion Promotion, Version 1.02 Patch with all cars takes 706MB, Demo has been removed with the release of the Complete Edition)
Need for Speed: Most Wanted: 2.2GB
New Little King's Story: 655MB(PSN Only)
@Ninja Gaiden Sigma Plus: 2.3GB(Version 1.00 of physical media takes 1120KB)
Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath: 1.41GB
Orgarhythm: 1.25GB(Demo is 278MB)
Persona 4 Golden: 3.1GB(Version 1.00 of physical media takes 2176KB)
+*Pinball Arcade PSVita: Version 1.08 with eight table expansions takes 668MB installed
Plants vs Zombies PSVita(PSN Only): Version 1.02 takes 82MB
*Playstation Vita Cliff Diving: 400MB(AR Game 1)
Playstation Vita Fireworks: 273MB(AR Game 2)
*Playstation Vita Table Soccer: 183MB(AR Game 3, version 1.01 without DLC takes 249MB)
+&*PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale: 1.3GB(Version 1.07 with all DLC installed takes 837MB)
Puddle: 558MB(Demo is the same size)
PulzAR: 134MB
*Pure Chess: Version 1.01 with all Add-ons takes 605MB
Ragnarok Odyssey: 1.1GB(Demo is 259MB, Version 1.00 takes 1536KB)
Rayman Origins: 932MB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.00 of Physical media takes 2048KB)
@!%Retro City Rampage: 31MB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.01 takes 53MB)
Resistance: Burning Skies: 3.1GB(Demo is the same size, retarded for people with 4GB cards, has an Online Pass, Version 1.01 of physical media takes 24MB)
*Reality Fighters: 573MB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.03 of physical media takes 102MB)
Ridge Racer: 816MB(Demo is 70MB)
Rocketbirds Hardboiled Chicken: 510MB
*Shinobido 2: Revenge of Zen: 1.1GB(Demo is 240MB, Version 1.02 of Physical media takes 22MB)
Silent Hill: Book of Memories: 1.6GB(Demo is 565MB, Version 1.00 of Physical media takes 2144KB)
Sine Mora: 667MB(Demo is the same size)
!Sly Cooper Thieves in Time: 3.5GB(Demo is 750MB)
Smart As: 1.4GB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.01 of Physical media takes 435MB)
Sonic and All-Stars Racing Transformed Bonus Edition: 1.5GB(Demo is 566MB, size not shown in the store until downloading)
*!%Sound Shapes: 970MB(Demo is 538MB)
Spy Hunter: 860MB(Version 1.00 of Physical media takes 800KB)
!*StarDrone Extreme: 136MB(Demo is the same size, version 1.01 installed takes 167MB)
*+!Street Fighter X Tekken: 2.1GB(Version 1.08 of Physical media with all DLC takes 77MB)
Sumioni: Demon Arts: 288MB(Demo is the same size)
Sunflowers: 94MB(Demo is the same size)
*Super Monkey Ball Banana Splitz: 807MB(Demo is 270MB)
*Super Stardust Delta: Version 1.00 takes 216MB installed
Supremacy MMA: 1.5GB
Table Ice Hockey: 54MB
*Table Top Tanks: 114MB
Tales of Innocence R: Japan Import, Version 1.00 takes 2080KB
@Tales From Space: Mutant Blobs Attack: 127MB
Touch My Katamari: 660MB(Demo is 99MB)
*Treasures of Montezuma Blitz(PSN Only): Free, Version 1.70 installed takes 201MB
*+Ultimate Marvel Vs. Capcom 3]]: 1.5GB(With a bunch of add-ons that work for both PS3 and PSVita once purchased, Version 1.02 of physical media with all DLC takes 11MBKB)
*@Uncharted: Golden Abyss: 3.2GB(Demo is 344MB, Treasure Hunter Add-on 100KB, Version 1.02 of physical media takes 78MB)
*Uncharted Fight For Fortune: 280MB(Demo is the same size, Version 1.01 with all DLC takes 305MB, save data from Uncharted Golden Abyss unlocks cards in this game)
Unit 13: 1.2GB(Demo is 845MB, has an online pass, Version 1.01 of physical media takes 12MB)
Virtua Tennis 4: 1.2GB
+*!When Vikings Attack: 690MB(Demo is the same size)
@!$*+wipEout 2048: 1.6GB(Demo 430MB), Fury Bundle Pack 580MB, WipeoutHD 300MB, version 1.04 of Physical media with both add-ons takes 735MB
+*Zen Pinball 2: 245MB(All content downloaded from Zen Pinball, and Marvel Pinball are free, all DLC tables and version 1.03 takes 1171MB)
Zero Escape: Virtue's Last Reward: 1.3GB(Demo is 132MB)

* Denotes the game has DLC
+ Denotes that buying the DLC, will give you the same content on both the PS3 and PSVita
% Denotes that buying the game on one system, will give you the game on both systems.
$ Denotes the game has an Online Pass
! Denotes Cross Platform Play
& Buying the PS3 Version, will give you the Vita version for free.
@ Denotes the game has been offered free via Playstation Plus.

Movies:
Assassin's Creed III Game Play Trailer: 71MB
Assassin's Creed III Liberation Accolades Trailer: 85MB
Assassin's Creed III Liberation Announcement Trailer: 50MB
Disgaea 3: Absence of Detention Trailer: 142MB
E3 2012 Playstation Product Showcase - Sizzle Video: 289MB
E3 2012 PSVita Showcase - Sizzle Video: 201MB
E3 2012 PS3 Showcase - Sizzle Video: 542MB
Escape Plan Launch Trailer: 133MB
escapeVektor Trailer: 58MB
God of War: Ascension Announce Trailer: 92MB
Hot Shots Golf World Invitational Game: 82MB
LittleBigPlanet Karting E3 Trailer: 117.3MB
LittleBigPlanet PSVita E3 Trailer: 118MB
ModNation Racers Road Trip Features: 103.2MB
Motorstorm RC Carnival Expansion Pack Trailer: 81MB
Motorstorm RC Launch Trailer: 115MB
Motorstorm RC Pro-Am Expansion Pack Trailer: 104MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Announce Trailer: 210MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Cole MacGrath Trailer: 78MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Dante Trailer: 100MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Evil Cole Trailer: 101MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale EVO 2012 Trailer: 75MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale E3 Trailer: 121MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Fat Princess Strategy Vid: 224MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale GamesCon Trailer: 111MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Heihachi Trailer: 80MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Jak and Daxter Trailer: 78MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Kratos Strategy Video: 243MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale PaRappa Strategy Video: 274MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Radec Strategy Video: 285MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Ratchet and Clank Trailer: 118MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Sackboy Trailer: 104MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale SDCC 2012 Trailer: 107MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Sly Cooper Strategy Video: 254MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Spike Trailer: 98MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Sweet Tooth Strategy Video: 225MB
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Toro Trailer: 89MB
Playstation Vita Cross Platform Play: 68MB
Playstation Vita Launch Video: 174MB
Pulse 2/28: 439MB
Pulse 3/13: 478MB
Pulse 3/27: 203MB
Pulse 4/10: 50MB
Pulse 4/24: 48MB
Pulse 5/8: 68MB
Pulse 5/22: 43MB
Pulse 7/3: 47MB
Resistance Burning Skies Launch Trailer: 136MB
Resistance Burning Skies Memorial Trailer: 147MB
Resistance Burning Skies Multiplayer Trailer: 81MB
Resistance Burning Skies Story Trailer: 132MB
Rocketbirds Hardboiled Chicken Trailer: 17.1MB
Sly Cooper Thieves In Time Augmented Reality: 177MB
Sly Cooper Thieves In Time Costume Trailer: 107.5MB
Sly Cooper Thieves In Time Gamescom Trailer: 129MB
Sly Cooper Thieves In Time Pulling the Heist: 187MB
Sly Cooper Thieves In Time Vita Announce Trailer: 102MB
Sound Shapes Introduces Beck & Pyramid Attack: 164MB
Sound Shapes Launch Trailer: 153MB
Sound Shapes Meets Jim Guthrie Video: 267MB
Sound Shapes PSVita DLC #1 Trailer: 53MB
Sound Shapes PSVita Level Editor Trailer: 550MB
StarDrone Extreme Launch Trailer: 127MB
Super Monkey Ball Banana Splitz CGI Trailer: 77MB
Super Stardust Delta Features Trailer: 152MB
Tales From Space Mutant Blobs Attack: 8.6MB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 1: 2.5GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 2: 2.5GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 3: 2.5GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 4: 2.34GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 5: 2.5GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 6: 2.5GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 7: 2.5GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 8: 2.2GB
The Tester Season 3 Episode 9: 2.2GB
Unit 13 Briefing 1: How to Play(409MB)
Unit 13 Briefing 2: Game Types(459MB)
Unit 13 Briefing 3: Sharing and Competing(238MB)
Unit 13 Launch Trailer: 136MB
Unit 13 Reveal Trailer: 141MB
Wipeout 2048 Game Trailer: 106MB

Playstation Mobile Apps:

@Beats Trellis($0.79): 20MB

Playstation Mobile Games(All games require more space for install, this is the default values)

Alien Breed($3.99): 56MB
Arctic Adventures Brain Freeze($1.99): 97MB
Aqua Kitty Milk Mine Defender($3.49): 149MB
@Beats Slider($0.79): 83MB
Blue Skies($6.99): 39MB
Bullion Blitz(Free?): 35MB
Chimpact($3.99): 86MB
Cosmic Clean-Up($1.29): 33MB
Cubixx($2.99) 21MB
Crash Planets($0.99): 24MB
Dead End Valentine($1.79): 23MB
Dungeon Bandit($4.29): 37MB
EcoFish($1.79): 53MB
*Everybody's Arcade: 157MB(Just for the app, you have to buy the other 5 card games separately)
Flick Hockey($2.29): 26MB
Frederic - Resurrection Of Music($3.99): 554MB
Fuel Tiracas($0.49): 39MB
Gun Commando($2.79): 59MB
Haunt the House Terrortown($3.49): 48MB
Hungry Giraffe($2.99): 28MB
iFishing($4.99): 34MB
Incurvio($7.49): 35MB
Lemmings(Free): 136MB
Life of Pixel($1.99): 18MB
Loot The Land($3.99): 77MB
Magic Arrows($4.99): 20MB
Meltdown Moon($0.79): 11MB
Numblast($2.99): 48MB
Nyoqix($5.49): 7869KB
OMG-Zombies!($2.99): 52MB
Panic!($1.99): 83MB
Pinky Spots Leg Massage($1.99): 19MB
Puzziball($0.99): 69MB
QuizQuizQuiz($3.49): 25MB
Radiant Flux($3.29): 9370KB
Rebel($1.99): 28MB
Rock Boshers DX($2.79): 39MB
@Samurai Beatdown($0.99): 63MB
Shiro-kuro hakkiri tsukeru kuma($3.79): 19MB
Sixty Second Shooter Deluxe($2.79): 4477KB
Still Life($0.49): 6360KB
Super Crate Box($3.49): 5402KB
Super Skull Smash GO!($3.29): 5870KB
Surge($3.29): 41MB
Tractor Trails($3.29): 37MB
Twist Pilot($3.49): 29MB
Underline($2.79): 14MB
Wipe($1.49): 16MB
Word Blocked($1.99): 22MB
You Are The Ref($3.49): 37MB
You Are The Umpire($3.49): 24MB
ZooZooGo!($3.29): 29MB

@=Denotes being offered free for a limited time.

Apps/Augmented Reality:
Colors: 11.5MB(Demo is 11MB)
Facebook: 19MB(Version 1.01 takes 24MB)
Flickr: 8864KB(Version 1.10 takes 18MB)
Foursquare: 6976KB
Livetweet: 4992KB
Music Unlimited: 18MB(Version 1.02 takes 34MB)
Netflix: 16MB(Version 1.02 takes 29MB)
Niconico: 14MB(Version 1.00 takes 17MB)
Paint Park: 36.9MB(Version 1.00 takes 42MB)
Playstation Home Arcade: 103MB
Resistance Burning Skies Augmented Reality Monument Viewer: 75MB
Skype: 9.2MB(Version 1.00 takes 12MB)
Treasure Park: 12.1MB(Version 1.02 takes 19MB)
Youtube: 5MB(Version 1.00 takes 7040KB)

There are only a few games you could afford to download with a 16GB card, and with videos, you will find yourself deleting them after you download them. Good luck downloading Uncharted on one game card, or BlazBlue, it's not worth paying $60 and $55(With the $46.84 price point) to be able to avoid physical media. And the Tester videos, just watch them on your PS3 or get a 32GB card.

They really need to release higher capacity cards, 32GB is plenty for a lot of downloaded content, but thank god for physical media so you can get more for your Memory Cards. However I am not a fan of wasting bandwith and having to delete/download constantly and I hate buying multiple cards to get around this, 16GB should be plenty for most casual gamers that do not plan on putting many games from the PSP, especially if you are going the physical route for Vita games. However, if you are going digital, 4-8 games at a time seems like a fair amount since most people do not touch a game once they beat it, however you have the option to re-download the games at any time.

Star Rating:
1 for the Price, once this is around 29.99 this will be more reasonable.
2 for the Storage Capacity, it's a decent amount

Updated: February 13, 2013, all games, movies, patch/dlc data and PlaystationMobile games updated

37 of 39 people found the following review helpful.
3Get this one or the 32 gig
By Ratchet&Spank
I have to agree with everyone else. These things are way too expensive, but whatcha gonna do...they're required. With that being said, the 4 and 8 gig are not going to be enough except for those who want nothing more then to save game data and maybe download 1 or 2 games/apps. I went with this one because I just couldn't bring myself to spend $100 on a memory card that's half the size of my fingernail. It should last me a while, but be warned that you're really only getting 14gigs of memory.

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful.
1It does what I need it to do flawlessly, and yet I loathed purchasing it.
By Christopher
There isn't much to be said here, as this has been doing it's job ever since I popped it into my Vita.

The major flaw? Sony acts like their memory chips are made from diamonds carved off the back of some elemental demi god of gemstones and awesome. There is no reason this should cost $40.00 when I can purchase a name-brand MicroSD flash card for almost $10.00 aside from pure obnoxiousness on the part of the manufacturer. These can be literally stamped out by the hundreds. I am fairly sure the packaging my cost Sony more.

Sony, just stop with the overpriced memory and the proprietary chargers/media. Why do I have three different chargers for a PSP-Go, a PSP-3000 and a Vita? Why do I even have a PSP-Go?

See all 263 customer reviews...More...


Kamis, 29 Oktober 2015

MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB GDDR5 2DVI/HDMI/DisplayPort PCI-Express Video Card N760 TF 2GD5/OC

MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB GDDR5 2DVI/HDMI/DisplayPort PCI-Express Video Card N760 TF 2GD5/OC..


MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB GDDR5 2DVI/HDMI/DisplayPort PCI-Express Video Card N760 TF 2GD5/OC

Buy MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB GDDR5 2DVI/HDMI/DisplayPort PCI-Express Video Card N760 TF 2GD5/OC By MSI Computer Corp.

Most helpful customer reviews

55 of 56 people found the following review helpful.
5Buy two and watch them outperform a GTX Titan
By Jason Evangelho
I'm evaluating two of these for Forbes Tech, and running them in SLI yielded better FPS results than the $1000 NVIDIA GTX Titan. This wasn't just at 1080p either. I used both synthetic benchmarks and real-world game tests at 1440p as well, and these dual MSIs continuously impressed, and at half the price of the Titan and roughly $150 less than the GTX 780.

Benchmarks and analysis: [...]

11 of 12 people found the following review helpful.
5Great GPU
By MrPie
This is definitely the fastest GPU I've owned (granted my last one was the HD4350), but nonetheless a great card. I've been throwing some benchmarks at it and it definitely holds up (furmark, boinc, blender, etc.) The good thing about this card too is that it runs well in SLI, so that could be a future upgrade path. This is a great card and should run any modern game decently at a relatively high resolution.

17 of 22 people found the following review helpful.
5great mid-range card
By James W
This card rocks. Plays everything I've thrown at it on ultra. Can't wait to get another and run them in SLI. To these others giving low ratings, think about what you're doing before you give a great product a crappy rating. Just because you didn't take the time to measure your PC before you purchased this is not a good reason to give it 3 stars. NOR is it ever right to give a product a bad rating because ANOTHER product performs slightly better for $80 more. Stupidity. 33 other people agree. If you were looking for a fairly priced mid-range video card, stop here. This is faster than the 660ti for $50 less.

See all 90 customer reviews...More...